Is there a significant difference, enough between a f/1.8 lens and a f/2.8 lens for star photography?
Will the f/1.8 lens let more light in to the point where its very noticable, and per say WORTH getting over the f/2.8. Or are they pretty much the same that you will not see any differences.
Nikon 40mm f/2.8 MICRO (i love the macro feature)
Nikon 35mm f/1.8
This lens is specifically for taking night/star photography.So if the f/1.8 is significantly better, please let me know.Im short on cash, and im unable to have both lenses to compare them side by side with different photos.
См. статью: Should i go with f/1.8 or f/2.8 for Star Photography?